Integrity Integrity

Comments and changes to this ticket

• You flagged this item as spam.
  

  ronin-278 (at lighthouseapp) January 17th, 2009 @ 05:14 PM

  • Tag changed from “git, hackfest, merge” to “git, hackfest”
  • State changed from “new” to “hold”

  Hum, actually, since we're merging SVN support in, we should consider the best way to handle this. Let's discuss before merging.

• You flagged this item as spam.
  

  ronin-278 (at lighthouseapp) January 17th, 2009 @ 05:25 PM

  • State changed from “hold” to “discuss”

• You flagged this item as spam.
  

  ronin-278 (at lighthouseapp) January 17th, 2009 @ 05:26 PM

  • no changes were found...
• 

  Simon Rozet January 29th, 2009 @ 09:01 PM

  • Tag changed from “git, hackfest” to “git, merge”
  • Title changed from “[fork] Integrate the generic post receive hook into integrity” to “Integrate the generic post receive hook into integrity”
• 

  Simon Rozet February 16th, 2009 @ 02:22 AM

  • Milestone set to “0.1.9”
• 

  Simon Rozet February 16th, 2009 @ 02:22 AM

  • Assigned user cleared.
• 

  Simon Rozet February 16th, 2009 @ 11:36 AM

  • Assigned user set to “Simon Rozet”
• 

  Simon Rozet February 18th, 2009 @ 04:26 PM

  • Milestone cleared.

  Moving to 0.2

• 

  Simon Rozet March 12th, 2009 @ 03:29 PM

  From the mailing-list:

  my current understanding is that Integrity use push from git repo to trigger the builds. Is there some way (or is it planned / implemented in a fork) to use polling instead ? Quite often, my customers CI server are not available on the internet, so I believe it would be hard to use triggers there (or is there some way to do that, like email push or something ?)

• 

  Simon Rozet May 13th, 2009 @ 09:37 PM

  • Tag changed from “git, merge” to “git, patch”

  [not-tagged:"merge" milestone:none tagged:"patch" bulk edit command]

• 

  Simon Rozet May 19th, 2009 @ 05:24 PM

  • Assigned user cleared.
• 

  Simon Rozet October 21st, 2009 @ 11:05 PM

  • State changed from “discuss” to “wontfix”